Busted:
An Illegal Home Reno Uncovered
Tired of trying to find a contractor?
Afraid you won't be issued a permit? There is another
way, but renegade renos are not for the faint of heart.
By Guy Saddy; photograph by Steven
Errico (Published: September 2006)
THE HOUSE IS ONE OF THE PRETTIEST on the block, its
chalk-scarred front walk now a gathering place for the
neighbourhood’s many kids. Today, there are no
saws noisily creating studs out of lengths of Douglas
fir; no Gyprock encrusted drywallers walk around on
stilts, looking like circus performers dusted with icing
sugar.
If one ignores a few chapters in this story, it is a
happy tale. Young couple with kids, the Sampsons, buy
lot value house in nice, yet still up-and-coming west
side neighbourhood. House is proverbial pile of crap,
its arts-and-crafts bones obscured by a history of ill-conceived,
poorly executed alterations. Extensive renovation is
planned. Over several months proverbial piece of crap
is transformed into solid and stately two-storey, three-bedroom
home with two-bedroom-plus-den basement suite. And they
all live happily ever after.
But we have skipped a critical plot point. In June,
2003, the reno was just two weeks from completion. The
backyard, however, was still a construction zone. Old
appliances were heaped on piles of torn-out lathe and
plaster; broken glass littered the ground. It’s
not as if the contractor desired to create an eyesore.
But there is no back alley to accommodate a garbage
bin, and a street bin could have attracted the kind
of attention one generally goes out of their way to
avoid when doing a full-scale renovation without the
required permits.
The trigger, as usual, was pulled by a disgruntled neighbour.
But which one? A condo owner to the north? The people
across the street? Next door? “All we know,”
says Adrienne, “is that someone made a call to
the city.” Posted on the front door, the yellow-and-red
“Stop Work” order looked as ominous as a
quarantine notice. Welcome to the neighbourhood.
Determining how common under-the-radar renovations are
is like guessing the number of grow-ops in the Lower
Mainland. One contractor says that in his experience
most exterior renos—involving obvious changes
to structure—are city-approved, but that up to
75 percent of interior renos are done without permits.
The few available stats support that view. In June the
city posted 19 Stop Work orders, but that likely represents
the tip of the iceberg. In the first half of 2006, the
city issued 215 permits for additions and 557 for alterations,
a total of 772 permits—a laughably low number
considering the volume of renovation activity in Vancouver.
Eight hundred renos over six months? Some wags might
say they can count that many in their neighbourhood.
In one day.
In undertaking a renegade renovation, the Sampsons were
hardly alone. Unlike most, however, they were caught.
What to do? As Jerrod put it, “Not complying was
not an option.” The city will take violators to
court; on rare occasions, those who refuse to abide
by the court’s rulings have been sentenced to
jail. To move forward, they would have to enter the
permit stream.
Because they’d started construction without a
permit, their permit fees were doubled. (The maximum
the city can levy is $5,000.) Architectural plans had
to be drafted and submitted, along with a land survey.
Because the Sampsons stipulated that their contractor
build everything to code—sprinklers on all floors,
stairs the bureaucratically sanctioned width—the
process should have been relatively painless. It might
have been, too. Except for one overlooked detail.
| 
The trigger,
as usual, was pulled by a disgruntled neighbour.
But which one? The people across the street? Next
door?

|
With all that can go wrong, why would
anyone renovate without a permit? Some homeowners don’t
realize they need one. (Rule of thumb: aside from re-roofing
and a few cosmetic exceptions, pretty well every alteration
does.) For others it’s a matter of aesthetics.
For example, a stair landing with horizontal rather
than vertical railings—a signature look of many
modern homes—will not pass inspection. (The “climbability”
of the railings, notes Dave Jackson, Vancouver’s
chief building inspector, is a safety hazard for children.)
Others avoid going legit because of zoning concerns.
If, for example, the square footage of your home is
already maxed out for the size of the lot, that deck
you want to add isn’t going to get approved unless
you go down a long and winding road. Apply for a permit;
be refused; then plead your case to the Board of Variance
and hope for a sympathetic outcome. Or say to hell with
it and roll the dice.
Primarily, though, people avoid getting permits to save
time and money. “We needed to get on with it,”
says Jerrod, “and the meter was ticking.”
Although licensing fees aren’t outrageous (generally
$1,000 to $1,500, says Jackson) and processing times
not unreasonable (three to 10 weeks), lost weeks can
be critical to any bottom line.
Then again, so can getting caught without a permit,
as the Sampsons, whose finances had been stretched,
were acutely aware. What they were unaware of, however,
was that by removing the stairway linking the main floor
and the basement suite during the unpermitted renovation,
their single-family dwelling was apparently no longer
a single-family dwelling. It was a duplex.
A duplex, eh? You’ll need to upgrade and separate
the electrical service, and add another electrical panel,
too. Now while you’re at it, are those power lines
too low to the ground? Better raise ‘em. Electrical
service coming in on the wrong side of the house? Change
that. Sprinklers? Excellent...but wait: was the water
service from the street upgraded?
Adrienne tried to persuade the increasingly bummed-out
Jerrod that the duplex was an opportunity: If they had
inadvertently created two homes, she reasoned, why not
sell one to finance their way out of this mess? A fine
idea. Except that the basement suite’s ceiling
height, seven feet, while adequate for a legal suite,
was insufficient for strata title consideration.
In the end, the Sampsons spent almost two years and
an extra $30,000 to resolve the outstanding issues.
Today, the house has two addresses, although, like conjoined
twins who share vital organs, they can never truly be
separated.
Still, the story is ultimately a happy one. The house
became a home. The Sampsons prepare dinners for friends
and relatives, and the kids play together outside. Neighbours
drop in, to chat and share a bottle of wine—one,
perhaps, with a guilty conscience.
Read more in the Real Estate Survival series:
Budding
Entrepreneurs: The highs and lows of buying
a former grow-op. By Marcie Good
Feng
Shui Revival: Why Feng Shuiing your house
pays big dividends. By Kevin Chong
Strata
Hell: Condo owners who threaten murder. Treasurers
who steal cash. Welcome to the weird world of strata
councils. By Steve Burgess
The
Hottest Guy in Town: Reno fever has taken
over the city and made contractors like Brad Wurmlinger
the hottest guys in town. By Matt O'Grady
|